Barracuda Email Security Service Review

I used the Barracuda Email Security Service for the majority of the month of October 2012 to filter spam for our secondary domain name. During that period of time, we received almost 11,600 emails. Roughly 2,000 were allowed through; 8,600 were blocked, and 1,000 were quarantined. Of the 2,000 allowed, I estimate 600 of them were actually spam.

Technical Support

All calls to Barracuda technical support are routed through receptionists that only take your information and create tickets. I first called one morning and didn’t get a call back until 5:30 pm that evening after I had left for the day. When I called in the next morning to speak with a technician, I was put back in the queue and did not receiving a call until the following morning. The total time to begin addressing my issue was close to 48 hours.

Spam Filtering

I regularly reviewed the last block of 50 emails that Barracuda allowed to pass through. Of those 50, typically 15 (30%) were missed spam. (The number of missed spam ranged from 7 to 27 out of the 50.) Many of the subjects of the messages allowed through contained words that were obviously spam (think improving oneself in bed). Even after ratcheting up all of the custom scoring settings, too many messages were still getting through. To their credit, I was not able to find any false positives. All messages marked as spam were definitely spam.

The Barracuda ESS does provide a mechanism to mark messages as spam. However, it provides no useful feedback to indicate that the message is now spam. Therefore, you could easily mark the same message as spam 3 or 4 times if you
reviewed the same block of emails more than once.

Setting up custom policies to filter messages was rather limited. My only options were to enter keywords and then specify if messages matching those criteria should be allowed, blocked, or quarantined. I would have expected some fuzzy logic to handle a phrase like “orders of magnitude,” which could refer to effect of the male enhancement pills or just how off the sales projections were.

Virus Filtering

It is unclear what kind of virus scanning the Barracuda ESS is performing as it allowed through at least two zip archives containing suspicious executable applications masquerading as DHL shipment invoices.

LDAP Synchronization

LDAP integration from our Active Directory domain to the Barracuda ESS worked reasonably well. I created a non-privileged user on our domain for Barracuda to use, opened a hole in our firewall, and specified the base DN for synchronization. Unfortunately, there was no way to filter our AD contacts that did not have SAV email addresses. The Barracuda ESS also pulled in all email addresses including our internal domain savtrans.local which is not actually used for email. A simple filter could have easily prevented loading of this bogus information.

If I had chosen not to use LDAP synchronization with the Barracuda Email Security Service, all of my users would have need to verify their accounts and all corresponding email addresses one by one. I believe an administrator should have the ability to load aliases without having to manually verify each one.


While the Barracuda Email Security Service is priced below the competition, I believe the competition offers a superior product. Their major outage on October 22, 2012 brought out a lot of complaints about the service in their forum. I do believe they have now stepped up their game, especially in the communication department, but I still can’t recommend them as a service that does a good job of filtering spam.

5 thoughts on “Barracuda Email Security Service Review”

  1. We are considering switching from Postini to Barracuda filtering. You mention competition offering a superior product. Who are you referring to?


  2. @Denny Fox,

    We are currently using mailMAX by Trustwave. We experienced some pretty nasty delays in email delivery in the past with mailMAX, but they have since resolved the issue. This is the reason we investigated other options but were ultimately more satisfied staying with mailMAX than switching to Barracuda. Trustwave’s support staff has also been consideribly more responsive to issues than Barracuda.

    We also looked at Trend Micro Hosted Email Security because we could bundle it with our current Trend Micro Worry-Free Business Security subscription. The sales representative never followed up on some questions I had so we didn’t pursue this further.

    Finally, we investigated McAfee SaaS Email Protection and Continuity. Ultimately, I found it too complex and cobbled together to be useful. (This service used to be MX Logic, and McAfee has bolted it on to their existing offerings.)

  3. we are comparing barracuda email security service with symantec products. did you ever look into symantec email or mail security for microsoft exchange (software installed on exchange server)? we have symantec endpoint protection so the cost to bundle with mail security for microsoft exchange and desktop system recovery for a 3 year subscription is ~ $20/user/year. we are currently paying $18/user/year for a 1 year subscription of the symantec endpoint protection. the cost for email is $12/user/year through our hosted server site. the mail comes with email encryption, which is nice but not necessary for us.

  4. @scott,

    If I recall correctly, I had an IT vendor tell us to stay away from Symantec Email However, I don’t remember their reasons why so I really can’t be of much help. Bundling is certainly advantageous. (That’s why we initially pursued Trend Micro.) My goal was to stay away from on premise email security (on our Exchange server or an appliance). A hosted solution prevents spam from ever reaching our network, which leaves our bandwidth available for more important uses.

    I’d be leery of signing up for a 3 year subscription without any sort of trial of Symantec’s system. The free trial that Barracuda provided made it very clear that their offering was not for us. I’d imagine you should be able to do the same with Symantec. I’d be curious to know how it goes.

  5. Adventitious doesn’t mean what you think it means. In way, it is kind of an antonym of the word bundled. The word you’re looking for is advantageous.

Comments are closed.